Legal Opinion

Conklin v. Leeds

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1871PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Macon county; the Hon. A. J. Gallagher, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

This was an action of trover, brought by appellee in the Macon circuit court, against appellant, to recover the value of one thousand bushels of corn. Appellee testified that Jefferson came to him and purchased the corn at 45 cents per bushel, in his own name, and did not name Conklin at the time. Jefferson, however, testified that he purchased the corn jointly for himself and Conklin, as partners, but did not remember that he said any thing at the time to appellee about appellant’s interest in the contract. Appellant swore that Jefferson was hired by him, and was engaged in purchasing corn…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Havana, Rantoul & Eastern Railroad v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Lake S. & M. S. Ry. Co. v. HochstimAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. McNuttAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API