Legal Opinion
Quonset Real Estate Corp. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 15, 1970No. Nos. 67 Civ. 3574, 67 Civ. 3576PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY. District Judge.
Defendant Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “MGM”) moves in the two above-captioned suits for a protective order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b) directing that the deposition of MGM by William Madden, its General Sales Manager, not be taken on the grounds of oppression and harassment.
Claiming the right to a fair opportunity to exhibit motion pictures in an open market free from preventive ac*241tion, plaintiffs have instituted private antitrust suits for treble damages charging defendants with exerting undue influence and economic pressure in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The Kansas City Star Company v. United States of America, Emil A. Sees v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- Caldwell-Clements, Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Pub. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Baush MacHine Tool Co. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Klein v. Lionel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
- Hillside Amusement Co. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maritime Cinema Service Corp. v. Movies En Route, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Quadrozzi v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Empire Volkswagen, Inc. v. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Natcontainer Corporation v. Continental Can Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.