Legal Opinion

Bean v. Clausen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 18, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion by the plaintiff, Tarleton H. Bean, for a new trial upon a case containing exceptions, ordered to be heard at the Appellate Division in the first instance, upon the dismissal of the complaint upon the pleadings and plaintiff’s opening at the New York Trial Term in December, 1905.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

This is an action by an honorably discharged soldier of the Union ■ army under section 1 of chapter 312 of the Laws of 1884, as amended *130by chapter 821 of the Laws of 1896, which has been since revised' in •'sections 20 and 21 of the Civil Service Law (Laws of 1899, chap. 370, as amd. by Laws of 1902, chap. 270, and Laws of 1904 chap. 697) to recover damages for his, wrongful' removal Tor political purposes on the 1st day of April, 1898, from the position of “ Superintendent of Aquarium,” Battery Park, in the municipal service of the city of Hew York, department of parks* by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Valkenburgh v. Mayor of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Hilton v. CramAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. People ex rel. Bean v. ClausenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Golomb v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Manko v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Austin v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Austin v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Manko v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API