Legal Opinion

Meeks v. Holmes Commerce Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Van Zandt County Court; C. L. Stanford, Judge. Action by the Holmes Commerce Company against T. B. Meeks. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.

This suit originated in the justice court of Van Zandt county, and from the judgment rendered in that court was appealed to the county court. The suit is to recover the sum of $100.50 for goods charged to have been sold by the defendant in error to the plaintiff in error; the allegations, in substance, being that on or about the 10th day of November, A. D. 1908, plaintiff entered into a written contract of sale, through its regular authorized agent, with defendant, T. B. Meeks, whereby plaintiff sold defendant one premium china assortment, for the sum of $100.58, to be shipped to defendant at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Barton v. Farmers' State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Roddy v. Citizens' State Bank of CopevilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Rahe v. YettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Barnes v. Early-Foster Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Farrar v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API