Legal Opinion

Melvin McCown v. Humble Oil & Refining Company

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 16, 1969No. 12330PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUTZNER, Circuit Judge:

The district court held that Melvin McCown, a shipyard worker, was not entitled to the warranty of seaworthiness and granted summary judgment for Humble Oil & Refining Company, owner of the tanker, ESSO BERMUDA. We affirm because McCown was not performing the traditional work of a seaman when he was injured aboard the ship.

Humble sent the ESSO BERMUDA to the Newport News Shipbuilding & Drydock Company for work that cost $407,194 and required 36 days. During this time, electricity, steam, and fresh water were supplied by the yard. The tanker’s boilers were shut down and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United New York & New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilots Ass'n v. HaleckiSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. West v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Farmer's Insurance Company of Idaho v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Solet v. M/V Capt. H. v. DufreneDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
  3. Drake v. E. I. DuPont deNemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Johnson v. Oil Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. Bellomy v. Union Concrete Pipe Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API