Melvin McCown v. Humble Oil & Refining Company
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BUTZNER, Circuit Judge:
The district court held that Melvin McCown, a shipyard worker, was not entitled to the warranty of seaworthiness and granted summary judgment for Humble Oil & Refining Company, owner of the tanker, ESSO BERMUDA. We affirm because McCown was not performing the traditional work of a seaman when he was injured aboard the ship.
Humble sent the ESSO BERMUDA to the Newport News Shipbuilding & Drydock Company for work that cost $407,194 and required 36 days. During this time, electricity, steam, and fresh water were supplied by the yard. The tanker’s boilers were shut down and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United New York & New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilots Ass'n v. HaleckiSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- West v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Farmer's Insurance Company of Idaho v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Solet v. M/V Capt. H. v. DufreneDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
- Drake v. E. I. DuPont deNemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Johnson v. Oil Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Bellomy v. Union Concrete Pipe Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.