Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Porter Handle & Cooperage Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 1942No. 17,006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Curtis, J. —

This was an action by the appellant against the appellees for workmen’s compensation based upon his claim that he was injured while in the employ of the said appellees.

An examination of the evidence most favorable to the appellees discloses, among other things, that the appellant was by occupation a trucker devoting his main activities to the hauling of logs from woods to lumber mills; that the appellee James Wilson is a timber buyer and appellee Porter Handle; and" Cooperage Company is engaged in a manufacturing business in which it uses logs; that the appellant had been engaged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lazarus v. SchererIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Petzold v. McGregorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Makeever v. MarlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Carr v. Krekeler, Gdn.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Rehm v. CutshallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nash v. MeguscharIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Clark v. HugheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Teter v. MID-STATE POULTRY AND EGG CO.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Teter v. Mid-State Poultry & Egg Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API