Atlanta Terminal Co. v. Alexander
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. Where a suit is against two or more parties and a demurrer is interposed upon the ground of a misjoinder of parties defendant, the plaintiff, upon being required to elect as to which of the defendants he will proceed against, can not make such election and at the same time except to the ruling requiring him so to do. Lavenden v. Haseman, 157 Ga. 275, 278 (121 S. E. 646); Smith v. Bugg, 35 Ga. App. 317 (133 S. E. 49). On the other hand, a mere ineffectual effort on the part of the plaintiff to reserve by his amendment the right to except to the ruling requiring the election can not be said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Realty Bond & Mortgage Co. v. HarleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Smith v. BuggCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Lavenden v. HasemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Bugg v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- Watts v. Colonial Stages Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Hodges v. Seaboard Loan & Savings Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Walker v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956