Legal Opinion
In re Ward
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided February 6, 1926No. 2694PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWKINS, District Judge.
Steve T. Ward was adjudged a voluntary bankrupt, and in due time applied for a discharge. Thereupon his largest creditor opposed his application upon the following grounds:
“(1) That appearer is informed and believes, and therefore avers, that said bankrupt, Steve T. Ward, is the owner of and has possession of two automobiles, and was the owner of and had possession of said automobiles at the date of the filing of his petition in bankruptcy, neither of which automobiles he listed on his schedule of„ assets filed with the referee in this matter.
“(2) That the said Steve…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, Brick Institute of America, the Public Service Commission of the State of Newyork, Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Elizabeth Town Gas Company, South Newjersey Gas Company, Atlanta Gas Light Company, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Linecorp., Publicservice Company of North Carolina, Inc., North Carolina Natural Gascorporation, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Public Service Electric& Gas Company, United Cities Gas Company, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Newjersey Board of Public Utilitycommissioners, Brick Association of North Carolina, Washington Gas Lightcompany, South Carolina Public Service Commission and South Carolina Energymanagement Office, General Motors Corporation, Staffer Chemical Company,philadelphia Gas Works,owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, American Textile Manufacturers Institute,inc., and Long Island Lighting Company, Intervenors. State of North Carolina and North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Federal Power Commission, Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc., Brick Institute of America, the Publicservice Commission of the State of New York, Public Service Company of Northcarolina, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, North Carolina Naturalgas Corporation,consolidated Edison Company of New York, United Cities Gas Company, Washingtongas Light Company, Pomana Corporation, Brick Association of North Carolina,south Carolina Public Service Commission and South Carolina Energy Managementoffice, Generalmotors Corporation, Staffer Chemical Company, Philadelphia Gas Works, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc.,and Long Island Lighting Company, (Lilco), Intervenors. Alabama Gas Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Southeast Alabama Gas District, Atlanta Gas Light Company, Southern Natural Gascompany, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Brick Institute of America, Georgia Industrial Group, and Alabama Public Service Commission, Intervenors. Battle Creek Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission, National Distillers and Chemical Corporation, Michigan Gas Storage Company, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, General Motors Corporation, Caterpillartractor Company, Mueller Brass Company, Corning Glass Works, Missourirefractories, Andersonclayton Foods, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Johns-Manville Fiberglass, Inc., and City of Indianapolis, Intervenors. v. Federal Power Commission, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Southern Natural Gas Company, Brickinstitute of America and Georgia Industrial Group, Intervenors. Michigan Consolidated Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission, Michigan Gas Storage Company, Anchor Hocking Corporation, Caterpillar Tractorcompany, National Distillers & Chemical Corporation, Battle Creek Gas Company,et Al., Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, General Motors Corporation,mueller Brasscompany, Corning Glass Works, Inc., A. P. Green Refractories Company,anderson Clayton Foods, Etc., Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Johns-Manvile Fiber Glass, Inc., and City of Indianapolis, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Davis v. National Interstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- In re RonkaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1940