Legal Opinion

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, Brick Institute of America, the Public Service Commission of the State of Newyork, Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Elizabeth Town Gas Company, South Newjersey Gas Company, Atlanta Gas Light Company, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Linecorp., Publicservice Company of North Carolina, Inc., North Carolina Natural Gascorporation, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Public Service Electric& Gas Company, United Cities Gas Company, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Newjersey Board of Public Utilitycommissioners, Brick Association of North Carolina, Washington Gas Lightcompany, South Carolina Public Service Commission and South Carolina Energymanagement Office, General Motors Corporation, Staffer Chemical Company,philadelphia Gas Works,owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, American Textile Manufacturers Institute,inc., and Long Island Lighting Company, Intervenors. State of North Carolina and North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Federal Power Commission, Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc., Brick Institute of America, the Publicservice Commission of the State of New York, Public Service Company of Northcarolina, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, North Carolina Naturalgas Corporation,consolidated Edison Company of New York, United Cities Gas Company, Washingtongas Light Company, Pomana Corporation, Brick Association of North Carolina,south Carolina Public Service Commission and South Carolina Energy Managementoffice, Generalmotors Corporation, Staffer Chemical Company, Philadelphia Gas Works, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc.,and Long Island Lighting Company, (Lilco), Intervenors. Alabama Gas Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Southeast Alabama Gas District, Atlanta Gas Light Company, Southern Natural Gascompany, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Brick Institute of America, Georgia Industrial Group, and Alabama Public Service Commission, Intervenors. Battle Creek Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission, National Distillers and Chemical Corporation, Michigan Gas Storage Company, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, General Motors Corporation, Caterpillartractor Company, Mueller Brass Company, Corning Glass Works, Missourirefractories, Andersonclayton Foods, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Johns-Manville Fiberglass, Inc., and City of Indianapolis, Intervenors. v. Federal Power Commission, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Southern Natural Gas Company, Brickinstitute of America and Georgia Industrial Group, Intervenors. Michigan Consolidated Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission, Michigan Gas Storage Company, Anchor Hocking Corporation, Caterpillar Tractorcompany, National Distillers & Chemical Corporation, Battle Creek Gas Company,et Al., Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, General Motors Corporation,mueller Brasscompany, Corning Glass Works, Inc., A. P. Green Refractories Company,anderson Clayton Foods, Etc., Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Johns-Manvile Fiber Glass, Inc., and City of Indianapolis, Intervenors

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 25, 1975No. 74-1150PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

512 F.2d 1332

168 U.S.App.D.C. 92

CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., Petitioner,

v.

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent,

Brick Institute of America, The Public Service Commission of

the State of NewYork, Piedmont Natural Gas Company,

Elizabeth town Gas Company, South NewJersey Gas Company,

Atlanta Gas Light Company, Transcontinental Gas Pipe

LineCorp., PublicService Company of North Carolina, Inc.,

North Carolina Natural GasCorporation, Columbia Gas

Transmission Corporation, Public Service Electric& Gas

Company, United Cities Gas Company, Brooklyn Union Gas

Company, NewJersey Board of Public…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mobil Alaska Pipeline Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API