Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Sakamoto

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2003No. 25321Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion by

ACOBA, J.

I concur in the result reached because, in the absence of the legislature’s prohibition of a deferred acceptance of guilty (DAG) or deferred acceptance of no contest (DANC) plea for a particular offense, a trial court has the inherent power to grant or deny a DAG or DANC plea. Inasmuch as the legislature has not prohibited a DANC plea with respect to assault in the second degree, Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 707-711(1)(a) (1993),1 it was within the inherent power of the first circuit court (the court) to grant or to deny the motion of Defendant-Respondent…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Richardson v. Sport Shinko (Waikiki Corp.)Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. DannenbergHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  4. LeMay v. LeanderHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Enos v. Pacific Transfer & Warehouse, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API