Legal Opinion

Rice v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 12, 1915No. 5561PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Mandamus, on the relation of Emmitt Rice, against F. S. Roberts, Judge, and Theo. G. Eisenlohr, stenographer. Judgment for the relator.

1Opinion of the CourtKet, C. J.

This is an original proceeding in this court, instituted by Emmitt Rice, as relator, against F. S. Roberts, judge of Ihe Twenty-Second judicial district, and Theo. G. Eisenlohr, official court stenographer for the same district, as respondents. Omitting formal parts, the petition charges that on the 10th day of April, 1915, at a regular term of the district court of Caldwell county, of which court the respondents were judge and official stenographer, respectively, a certain cause, entitled William Schertz v. Emmitt Rice, relator herein, was -tried, and judgment rendered in favor of Schertz…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte FreadCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Loflin v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Otto v. WrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Zamora v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Houston T. C. R. Co. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API