Legal Opinion

Preston v. Witherspoon

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1886No. 12,843PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Erom the Gibson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

The nature of the case sufficiently appears from the special finding of facts made by the court below at, the request of appellants.

As the brief of counsel for appellees contains a fuller statement of the facts found than does the brief of counsel for appellants, we take therefrom the following summary, making-a few additions thereto :

The defendants, Runcie & Wallace, under the firm name of “The Fort Branch Elevator Company,” were engaged at Fort Branch in buying, selling and shipping wheat, and for hire receiving wheat from farmers for storage, and on demand of the depositors were to return…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Cowdrey v. VandenburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Quick v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Rice v. NixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Hunter v. FitzmauriceIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Morningstar v. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Velsian v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Kastner v. AndrewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Kiefer v. KlinsickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Southern Commercial Savings Bank v. Slattery's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API