Legal Opinion

Ruggeri v. Griffiths

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1934No. Appeal, 30PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

These proceedings in the form of a feigned issue were instituted to determine the right of the parties to a fund arising out of a policy of insurance issued by the Prudential Insurance Company to Pasquale Ruggeri who died May 17, 1931. The original beneficiary was his daughter, Angelina Ruggeri, wlm at the time of beginning the action was a minor, but since the appeal to this court has become of full age, and by order of court has been substituted as appellant in place of her guardian.

The main question for determination is the validity of a change of beneficiary made by insured a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riley v. WirthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Gannon v. GannonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Estate of K.I. Sanes. (No. 1.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Herrod v. KimbroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Breckline v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company Of Philadelphia v. Selma EhrlichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. Skamoricus v. KonagiskieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. City of Philadelphia v. SessionsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Bell v. CrivianskyMontana Supreme Court · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API