Skamoricus v. Konagiskie
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This is an interpleader to determine which of. two claimants is entitled to the proceeds of a life insurance policy paid into court by the insurance company. Appel lant complains of the refusal of binding instructions and of motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons thus stated in the opinion of the learned court below filed pursuant to Rule 58:
“Respecting change of beneficiary, the policy provides that every change of beneficiary must be made by written notice to the company at its home office accompanied by the policy for endorsement…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Riley v. WirthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Gannon v. GannonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Estate of K.I. Sanes. (No. 1.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Ruggeri v. GriffithsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Beaver Trust Co. v. KertisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
3Cited by25 opinions
- Breckline v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- City of Philadelphia v. SessionsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Shay v. Merchants Banking Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Tomilio v. PiscoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.