Legal Opinion

State v. McMullin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 13, 1988No. 86-1875PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

The issue presented is whether a due process violation occurred because the trial court instructed the jury to consider defendant’s insanity defense before it considered whether he was guilty of the offense charged. While the jury should not have been instructed in this manner, we hold that defendant was afforded due process of law and affirm the conviction.

Defendant Murl Edward McMullin was charged with first-degree murder in the strangulation death of his girlfriend. Iowa Code § 707.2(1) (1985). After a jury trial he was convicted as charged. The State presented evidence at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. NewellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  2. State of Iowa v. Mark Daryl BeckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. State v. SchulerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  4. State v. BeetsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  5. State v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API