Legal Opinion
Moss v. Arnold
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 10, 1986No. Nos. C-3-85-376, C-3-85-919PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOC. # 28 IN CASE NO. C-3-85-376 AND DOC. # 13 IN CASE NO. C-3-85-919); PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINTS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; TERMINATION ENTRIES
RICE, District Judge.
These cases (Nos. C-3-85-376 and C-3-85-919) are before the Court on Motions to Dismiss (Doc. # 28 in Case No. C-3-85-376 and Doc. #13 in Case No. C-3-85-919), which argue that this Court is without subject matter jurisdiction to hear Plaintiff’s claims. For the reasons set forth below, the Court agrees that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over these cases and,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Louis A. Carducci v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary, U.S. Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- In Re Telecommunications Research and Action CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Celia A. Wren v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- (PS) Sprague v. HullDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Delgrosso v. HemingwayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- VEBS, INC., a California Corporation v. LEON SIMONEAU, an individual, and DOES 1–10, inclusiveDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025