Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Stainbrook

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Bourbon District Court. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

*357Opinion by

Holt, C.:

This action was commenced by Daniel Stainbrook, defendant in error, presenting a note for allowance against the estate of J. A. Bryant, deceased, in the probate court of Neosho county. It was first allowed as a valid claim against the estate, but afterward, when Ida K. Bryant, plaintiff in error, was appointed administratrix of the estate, she made application for a rehearing, which was granted, and upon such rehearing the note was rejected as a valid claim by the probate court. From that order Stainbrook appealed to the district court, and subsequently a change of venue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holcomb v. . HolcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Neil v. J. I. Case & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Auchampaugh v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heery v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Conklin v. YatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  3. German Ins. Co. of Freeport v. FrederickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  4. Waltmire v. BadgerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API