Bryant v. Stainbrook
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Bourbon District Court. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
*357Opinion by
Holt, C.:
This action was commenced by Daniel Stainbrook, defendant in error, presenting a note for allowance against the estate of J. A. Bryant, deceased, in the probate court of Neosho county. It was first allowed as a valid claim against the estate, but afterward, when Ida K. Bryant, plaintiff in error, was appointed administratrix of the estate, she made application for a rehearing, which was granted, and upon such rehearing the note was rejected as a valid claim by the probate court. From that order Stainbrook appealed to the district court, and subsequently a change of venue…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Holcomb v. . HolcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Neil v. J. I. Case & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Auchampaugh v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
3Cited by4 opinions
- Heery v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Conklin v. YatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- German Ins. Co. of Freeport v. FrederickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- Waltmire v. BadgerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943