Legal Opinion

Metro Gold, Inc. v. Coin

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 9, 2008No. A07-2117Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant Metro Gold, Inc. challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondents Garrett Coin and the Estate of Rex Peterson on appellant’s claim for costs, interest, and attorney fees pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 604.113. Appel lant contends that the district court (1) erred in its application of the law when it found that issuer Rex Peterson did not receive notice of his dishonored check under Minn.Stat. § 604.113 upon appellant’s mailing of the notice; and (2) abused its discretion when it determined that the defense of impossibility was a valid…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Eischen Cabinet Co. v. HildebrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Powers v. SiatsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API