Legal Opinion

Gray v. Bryant

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 15, 1989No. 23014PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

This appeal involves the question of whether a motion to amend a new trial motion was timely submitted and whether there was newly discovered evidence which would entitle appellant to a new trial. Although expressing reservations as to whether the motion to amend was timely under Rule 59 of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, the trial court considered the amendments along with the motion for a new trial. The trial court denied the motion, ruling that appellant had not been prejudiced. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

This is a medical malpractice action. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson Ex Rel. Estate of Thompson v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Brown v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  3. Smith v. QUATTLEBAUMSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  4. Jenkins v. Dixie Specialty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Long v. NORRIS & ASSOCIATES, LTD.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. BuckomCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Wilson v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API