Legal Opinion

Tavis Ray Crittendon v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 8, 2018No. Court of Appeals Case 18A-CR-206Published

1Opinion of the Court

Vaidik, Chief Judge.

Case Summary

[1] Following a heroin overdose, the State charged Tavis Ray Crittendon with Level 6 felony possession of a narcotic drug. Following a bench trial, the trial judge found him guilty, reasoning that Crittendon admitted using heroin and had to possess the heroin in order to use it. Crittendon now appeals, arguing that he cannot be convicted of possessing the heroin he admitted consuming. Because this Court has already determined that a defendant can be found guilty of possessing the drug that was consumed (without the State having to introduce the drug into…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Helton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Kellems v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Neff v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. VormIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Dylan R. Smart v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API