Seymour v. Seymour

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly determined, pursuant to the factors set forth in Fox v Fox (177 AD2d 209, 210), that it was in the child’s best interests to award the parties joint custody with primary physical placement with respondent, despite the fact that the child would thereby be separated from her half-sister (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 173). The court expressed concern about petitioner’s drinking habits. In addition, the court noted that the child had always resided in the marital home where respondent would continue to reside,…