King v. King
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Family Court properly denied the petition seeking legal and *1029physical custody of the children and granted respondent’s cross petition for that same relief. The court’s determination is “based upon a first-hand assessment of the credibility of the witnesses after an evidentiary hearing, is entitled to great weight and will not be set aside unless it lacks an evidentiary basis in the record” (Matter of Hill v Rogers, 213 AD2d 1079; see, Matter of Smith v Smith, 241 AD2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Fox v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Wodka v. WodkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Hill v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Barnes v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pinkerton v. PensylAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- King v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Roody v. CharlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Oliver v. OliverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Richard W. v. Maribel G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.