Legal Opinion

Veasey v. Joshlin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 23, 1974No. 74-214PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Appellant Nora Veasey sued appellee Roscoe Daniel Joshlin for personal injuries and property damages arising from an automobile collision. A settlement in the case was reached but Nora Veasey subsequently retracted her commitment to settle. The trial court held that the agreement, reached between the attorneys and with the consent of the parties, was binding and consequently not subject to rescission. Judgment was entered for the amount of the settlement. Nora Veasey concedes that the law concerning the validity of a compromise settlement is adverse to her position;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. BoorhemDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1954
  2. Cullin-McCurdy Construction Co. v. Vulcan Iron WorksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Byford v. Gates Bros. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  4. Moore v. MurrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  5. Turner Furnishing Goods Company v. SnyderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Terra Land Services, Inc. v. McIntyreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API