Wright v. Valderas
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.. Because of the ever apparent want of convenience to attorneys in ascertaining requirements of the law relative to foundation for consideration of a petition instituting an original proceeding in an appellate court, we set down for hearing the petitioner’s Motion for Leave to File Petition for Mandamus.
In general it has been found that all members of the bar understand that a Court of Civil Appeals is vested with jurisdiction to act upon original proceedings only in the protection of its appellate jurisdiction. (For our discussion we disregard habeas corpus proceedings.) Further,…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Kopeski v. MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Johnson v. Hughes, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
- Humphreys v. Caldwell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
- Keller v. Walker, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
- Witherspoon v. Pouland, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.