Cranston v. Hardin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:
On a previous appeal in this case we held that a provision in the Connecticut Milk Marketing Order, 7 C.F.R. §§ 1015, et seq., permitting “nearby” dairy farmers to receive 46 cents per hundredweight more for their milk marketed in Connecticut than “distant” farmers — i. e., farmers located outside of the market area — was invalid.1 See Cranston v. Hardin, 428 F.2d 822 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 949, 91 S.Ct. 937, 28 L.Ed.2d 232 (1971). We are now asked to decide whether, on remand, Judge Foley of the Northern District of New York fairly disposed of all…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Warner Communications Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Maley v. Del Global Technologies Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- 25 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1750, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,876 Martha Frances Franks, Martha Ann Thweatt, Plaintiffs-Movant v. The Kroger CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Quigley v. Braniff Airways, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1979
- Robinson v. First National City BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.