Legal Opinion
Christmon v. Allstate Insurance
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided February 1, 2000No. Civil Action A.3:99CV151BNPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBOUR, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the motion of Defendant for summary judgment. Also before the Court is a request by Plaintiff that the Court defer ruling on the summary judgment motion pending the outcome of additional discovery. The Court construes this as a motion pursuant to Rule 56(f) of the Federal Rules of Civñ Procedure for a continuance of the summary judgment motion. The Court has considered both motions and the responses and finds that the summary judgment motion should be granted and the Rule 56(f) motion should be denied.
I. Background
Plain…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Kennett-Murray Corporation v. John E. BoneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,451 Jerry Krim, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Banctexas Group, Inc., Banctexas Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Lillian Washington, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Arsane Washington v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- TREMONT LLC v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Addison v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2000
- Montalto v. Viacom International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2008