Legal Opinion

State v. Goldberg

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 26, 2014No. 8/13Published

1Opinion of the Court

State of Maryland v. Stanley Goldberg, et al., No. 8, September Term, 2013 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – DUE PROCESS & TAKINGS – VESTED RIGHTS – GROUND RENTS: Legislation that replaced retrospectively ejectment with a lien-and- foreclosure process applicable to defaulting lessees of ground leases extinguished the right of re-entry, a part of the previously created bundle of vested rights in ground rent holders. By abrogating a vested right, the legislation violates the due process provision of Maryland’s Declaration of Rights and the takings provision of Maryland’s Constitution. Circuit Court for Anne…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Pearsall v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Dua v. Comcast Cable of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Livesay v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Langston v. RiffeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API