Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Ambroski
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided March 31, 2015No. Case No. 2:13-cv-00504-MHH-JEOPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA, District Judge.
In his report and recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the undersigned District Judge grant the defendants’ motions for summary judgment. (Doc. 48). Mr. Kelly filed objections to the report and recommendation. (Doc. 49). For the reasons stated below, the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report and accepts his recommendation.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
When reviewing a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, a district court must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified *1325proposed findings…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Michael Horton v. Captain GilchristCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025
- Amaro v. CarterDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2023
- BAYSE v. WARDDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2024
- Brisbon v. Chatham CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2022
- GILLIS v. SMITHDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.