Legal Opinion

Gratton v. United Parcel Service Inc

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided February 12, 2025No. 1:22-cv-03149Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 TAHVIO GRATTON, NO. 1:22-CV-3149-TOR 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 9 v. MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL 10 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., 11 Defendant. 12 13 BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant’s Motion for New Trial, Amendment 14 of the Judgment, or Remittitur (ECF No. 271). This matter was submitted for 15 consideration with oral argument. The Court has reviewed the record and files 16 herein, considered the parties’ oral arguments, and is fully informed. For the 17 reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Motion for New Trial,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Surrell v. California Water Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Natural Beverage Distributors, D/B/A Mendocino Coast Distributing Co. Florence M. BeardsleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Wei Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods, Inc., Delaware Corporation McMi Food Company, a Texas Corporation Harry Lees, a Natural PersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API