Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Twin Fork Coal Co.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided October 14, 1963No. 737PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWINFORD, Chief Judge.

This is an action for damages and an injunction by a property owner against the lessee of the minerals underlying his land. The gist of the action is that the defendant, a mining company, is strip mining and augering coal from the land and that the attendant damage to the surface is not permitted by the mineral conveyance. The case is now before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. The presentation of certain background information at this point will clarify the issues involved in the case.

This controversy has features in common with a number of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Chisholm v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1793
  5. Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Akers v. BaldwinKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Watson v. Kenlick Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1973
  3. Akers v. BaldwinKentucky Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API