Akers v. Baldwin
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
736 S.W.2d 294 (1987)
Everett AKERS et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
Charlotte BALDWIN et al., Defendants, and
Falcon Coal Company et al., Intervening Complainants.
Matthew BAKER et al., Appellants,
v.
Elizabeth WOOTEN et al., Appellees.
Nos. 85-SC-392-CL, 85-SC-422-TG.
Supreme Court of Kentucky.
July 2, 1987.
As Corrected July 2, 1987.
As Modified on Denial of Rehearing September 24, 1987.
Joe F. Childers, Shepherd & Childers, Lexington, Thomas J. Fitzgerald, Frankfort, David Rubinstein, Prestonsburg, for plaintiffs.
Iris S. Nickell, David J. Obradovich, Mary Katherine Daugherty, Frankfort, for defendants.
John A.…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Stephenson; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Lambert.
2Cases cited46 opinions
- City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Skivolocki v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
- Hilen v. HaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
- Legislative Research Commission Ex Rel. Prather v. BrownKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
- Stewart v. ChernickySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.