Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Hoffman

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 14, 1909PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error tó a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Newport News in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error. On the trial the plaintiff tendered one instruction on the measure of damages which was given, and is.copied in the opinion below. Tbe defendant tendered three instructions on the same subject, which the trial court refused, to give.

Read the full summary

Error tó a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Newport News in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error. On the trial the plaintiff tendered one instruction on the measure of damages which was given, and is.copied in the opinion below. Tbe defendant tendered three instructions on the same subject, which the trial court refused, to give. The following are copies of the declaration, grounds of demurrer assigned to the declaration, instructions refused and specifications of grounds of demurrer to the evidence: The Deolabatioh. “W. F.…

1Opinion of the Court

Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

While working as a mechanic upon a pier belonging to the *63Chesapeake and. Ohio Hallway Conrpany, Hoffman sustained injuries for which he brought suit, and the jury rendered a verdict in his behalf for $2,500, subject to a demurrer to the evidence.

Numerous rulings of the trial court were excepted to, and are now before us for review upon a writ of error awarded the railway company.

The first error assigned is that the demurrer to the declaration was overruled by the trial court.

The declaration is a lengthy one. The circumstances out of which the cause…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. MathewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Hortenstein v. Virginia-Carolina Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  5. Darracott v. Chesapeake & Ohio R. R.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Thomson v. BolesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  2. Christie v. MitchellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Green v. . Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. McCullersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  5. Todt v. ShawSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API