Legal Opinion

Rutledge v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 19, 1936No. 8158PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McClendon, chief justice.

This is a suit in trespass to try title, involving a 5%-acre tract of land in Hays county. The judgment was in favor of plaintiffs (appellees), upon a directed verdict. Defendants (other than fhose disclaiming) have appealed. For convenience we will designate the parties as in the court below.

Plaintiffs are children and heirs at law of Pinkie (Mitchell) Gray, who died intestate in 1930. Pinkie married George Gray in 1914, plaintiffs being Pinkie’s children by a former union. The property was set aside to Pinkie in 1926, in a partition presumably of the estate of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Henry v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Webb v. ReynoldsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  3. Gilbert v. OdumTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Conn v. MarshburnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Street Realty Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Mission v. PopplewellTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Villarreal v. Laredo National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  3. Fort Worth Neuropsychiatric Hospital, Inc. v. Bee Jay Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Balli v. McManusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. Lindquist v. SanfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API