Legal Opinion
Lindquist v. Sanford
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 13, 1939No. 10535PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SLATTON, Justice.
Grady Holland Sanford sued in trespass to try title. Joseph Lindquist and his attorney answered by pleading the ten year statute of limitations (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 5510) together with other pleas. A jury, in answer to a special issue, found against Lindquist and his attorney, and judgment was rendered in accordance with the verdict. Lindquist alone appeals.
It is claimed that the court erred in overruling a motion for a directed verdict of the appellant.
The appellee offered evidence to the effect that A. W. and H. G. Seeligson and other members of the Seeligson family…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wininger v. Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
- Robbins v. WynneTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Satterwhite v. RosserTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Thompson v. MoorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Texas & P. R'y Co. v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of Texas and New Idria Mining & Chemical Company v. J. W. Marshall, D/B/A Marshall Pipe & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Hix v. WirtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Nelson v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- MOBIL OIL CORPORATION v. City of Wichita FallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Balli v. McManusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.