People v. Calio
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROUSSARD, J.
This is another in a series of cases involving the five-year serious felony enhancement of Penal Code sections 667 and 1192.7.1 In People v. Jackson (1985) 37 Cal.3d 826 [210 Cal.Rptr. 623, 694 P.2d 736] (hereafter Jackson), we said that the prosecution could not prove that a prior burglary conviction qualified as a serious felony under sections 667 and 1192.7 unless residential entry was an element of the offense.2 A defendant who admits that his prior burglary involved residential entry, however, is bound by that admission.
Defendant in the present case moved to strike…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. CrowsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. AlfaroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. RiggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Park City Services, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. DillinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.