Legal Opinion

People v. Calio

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1986No. Crim. 24711PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROUSSARD, J.

This is another in a series of cases involving the five-year serious felony enhancement of Penal Code sections 667 and 1192.7.1 In People v. Jackson (1985) 37 Cal.3d 826 [210 Cal.Rptr. 623, 694 P.2d 736] (hereafter Jackson), we said that the prosecution could not prove that a prior burglary conviction qualified as a serious felony under sections 667 and 1192.7 unless residential entry was an element of the offense.2 A defendant who admits that his prior burglary involved residential entry, however, is bound by that admission.

Defendant in the present case moved to strike…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. CrowsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. AlfaroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. RiggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Park City Services, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. People v. DillinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API