People v. Dillingham
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
Defendant Ricky Dillingham was convicted, after a jury trial, of residential burglary (Pen. Code, § 459). In a bifurcated court trial, he was found to have suffered two prior serious felony convictions of residential burglary within the meaning of Penal Code 1 section 667, sub division (a). Defendant was sentenced to a total of 16 years. Defendant contends that the trial court prejudicially erred in (1) denying his motion for a pretrial lineup; (2) denying his motion to exclude the use of prior convictions for impeachment; and (3) imposing two 5-year enhancements for his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. AntickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. MuldrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- People v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.