Legal Opinion
Ohio v. Kentucky
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 5, 1973No. 27 ORIGPublished
1Opinion of the Court 1
410 U.S. 641 (1973)
OHIO
v.
KENTUCKY.
No. 27, Orig.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 10, 1973.
Decided March 5, 1973.
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED BILL OF COMPLAINT.
Joseph M. Howard argued the cause for plaintiff on exceptions to the Report of the Special Master. With him on the brief was William J. Brown, Attorney General of Ohio.
John M. Famularo, Assistant Attorney General of Kentucky, argued the cause for defendant pro hac vice in answer to exceptions to the Report of the Special Master. With him on the brief were Ed W. Hancock, Attorney General, and James M. Ringo, Assistant…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Blackmun; Dissent.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Virginia v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Arkansas v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- HENDERSON BRIDGE COMPANY v. Henderson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySupreme Court of the United States · 1820
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.