E. Fougera & Co. v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submissions of controversies upon agreed statements of fact pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, J.:
These three controversies all involve the same question, and are all submitted upon agreed statements of fact. The several plaintiffs are manufacturers or dealers in what are commonly known as proprietary or patent medicines, intended to be used internally. Many of these medicines have been in common use for years, so that their names have become familiar to the public. Their ingredients and the formulae under which they "are prepared are jealously guarded trade secrets and as such are considered to be of great value.
The judgment which each of these plaintiffs seeks is to *826restrain…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Reinman v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Health Department v. Rector of Trinity ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Tabor v. . HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spiselman v. RabinowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Sachs v. Cluett, Peabody & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941