Legal Opinion

National Liberty Insurance v. Trattner

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 4, 1927PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). Appellant contends that the court erred in not sustaining its motion to quash the summons; that it did not consent to service of summons upon it in this State in such actions, but only in order that it might be authorized to do business here in compliance with the requirement of the laws in that respect, and that the court was without jurisdiction to render judgment against it herein.

The facts are undisputed that appellant company is a foreign insurance corporation authorized to do business here under our laws; that the contract for insurance was made in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Clarendon Boat Oar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. State v. Lancashire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  3. Penn v. GarvinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  4. American Casualty Co. v. LeaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. American Central Life Insurance v. LandwehrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  2. Yockey v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Green v. Equitable Powder Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1951
  4. American Farmers Insurance Co. of Phoenix v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  5. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. MannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API