Consolidated Rail Corp. v. United Transportation Union General Committee of Adjustment
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BARTLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) has brought this action against certain labor unions and their leaders allegedly for instituting and threatening strikes or work stoppages over “minor disputes” in vio lation of the Railway Labor Act (the “RLA”), 45 U.S.C. §§ 151-188. Conrail seeks declaratory and injunctive relief as well as damages. Before the court is the motion of the defendants to dismiss the amended complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. United Transportation UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996