Mike Brooks Car World, Inc. v. Sudduth
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
THOMPSON, Presiding Judge,
concurring in the result, dissenting from the rationale, and dissenting from the instructions on remand.
In reversing the trial court’s judgment, the main opinion relies on the principle that a party cannot be said to have reasonably relied on a fraudulent oral representation if that representation is contradicted by a writing. Because I do not agree that that principle is applicable to the present case, I respectfully dissent from the rationale of the main opinion as well as from the main opinion’s instructions to the trial court on remand. For separate reasons,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jawad v. GranadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- AmerUs Life Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Ex Parte Norwood Hodges Motor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- McLendon Pools, Inc. v. BushCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Birmingham Coal Coke Co., Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.