Legal Opinion

State v. Ramirez

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 20, 1988No. 5250PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of the crime of attempted robbery in the first degree, in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-134 (a) (3). The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in refusing to instruct the jury that an unfavorable inference could be drawn from the state’s failure to produce a witness, (2) in failing to instruct the jury, sua sponte, on the victim’s interest in the case, and (3) in allowing into evidence, without any limiting instruction, evidence of the use of narcotics by the defendant. We find no…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  2. State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. State v. CooperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Shelnitz v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. PersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. State v. GoodrumConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. State v. VegaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  4. State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API