Offenbacher v. City of Columbus
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division
1Opinion of the CourtKinkead, J.
The plaintiffs petition is as follows:
The plaintiff, Sophia Offenbacher, for her fourth amended petition herein, by leave of the court, says the defendant, the *75city of Columbus, Ohio, is a municipal corporation duly organized and constituted under the laws of Ohio; that the defendant, the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company, is a corporation organized and constituted under the laws of Pennsylvania and having a principal office and place of business and being actually engaged in business as a common carrier within said county.'
The plaintiff further says she is now and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cogswell v. . N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Waggoner v. JermaineNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- J. S. Keator Lumber Co. v. St. Croix Boom Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Works v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Rogers v. BonnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.