Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 18, 1975No. 3 Div. 322PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOKOUT, Judge.

Appellant was indicted for the offense of rape and was represented by court appointed counsel during the trial and on appeal.

Five witnesses testified for the State. The prosecutrix identified the appellant as the person who raped her. She made a personal identification and identification by tatoos on the appellant. Other witnesses were the mother of the prosecutrix; the examining .physician, Dr. Barry L. Wilson; a State Toxicologist, Mrs. Mary Frances Wisdom; and Montgomery City Detective, Wesley Strane.

After a prima facie case was made by the State, the defendant requested to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Hardley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. State v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
  4. Browder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  5. Hayes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lamb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  2. Lamb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API