Legal Opinion

Schumaker v. Boehringer Mannheim Corp./DePuy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint against defendant Boehringer Mannheim Corporation/ DePuy dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying that part of the motion of Boehringer Mannheim Corporation and DePuy, Inc. (defendants), sued incorrectly as Boehringer Mannheim Corporation/DePuy, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them as time-barred. The complaint, filed April 7, 1998, asserted various causes of action arising out of allegedly defective hip prostheses that were implanted in 1988.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Massie v. CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. People v. MaherNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Kramer v. HerreraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MTGLQ Invs., LP v. ZaveriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API