Legal Opinion

National Benevolent Society v. Harris

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 15, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). Appellant insists that the court erred in not giving- its peremptory instruction directing the jury to find for the appellee in the minimum sum of $100, less the small credit to which appellant was entitled, and this contention must be sustained.

“Policies of insurance should be interpreted by the rules governing other written contracts where the meaning of the language used is clear and explicit; but, where there is doubt as to the meaning of the language used, they should 'be construed strictly against the insurer, and favorably to the insured.” Home Mut.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Home Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  3. Knights & Ladies of Security v. LewellenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Countryside Casualty Co. v. GrantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. United Order of Good Samaritans v. ReavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API