Vega-Castro v. Commonweatlh of Puer
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Spurred by the Supreme Court’s changing explication of Eleventh Amendment jurisprudence, we recently determined that a non-consenting state cannot be sued in a federal venue by public employees who seek to enforce the penalty provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (FLSA). See Mills v. Maine, 118 F.3d 37, 49 (1st Cir.1997); accord Abril v. Virginia, 145 F.3d 182, 185-86 (4th Cir.1998) (collecting similar cases). This result was compelled by the Court’s decision in Seminole Tribe v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44, 116 S.Ct. 1114, 134 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996). 1…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Antilles Cement Corp. v. Cemex De Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Maysonet-Robles v. CabreroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Espinal-Dominguez v. Commonwealth of PRCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Rosie D. Ex Rel. John v. SwiftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Acosta-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.