Legal Opinion

State v. Poe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 2004No. 28404PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction for disturbing the peace in which the appellant alleges, among other things, that Idaho Code § 18-6409 is unconstitutionally overbroad. We affirm the judgment.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On September 7, 1999, the defendant-appellant Joseph Poe was charged with disturbing the peace in violation of Idaho Code § 18-6409 based upon statements he made to a thirteen-year-old boy who had come with his mother to Poe’s home to pick up another child.1 The jury found Poe guilty, and the district court upheld his conviction on appeal. He then…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. ManzanaresIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Webster v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  3. State v. Godwin, Sr.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. Bryann Kristine LemmonsIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. James Leroy SkunkcapIdaho Supreme Court · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API