Legal Opinion

Engen v. Kincannon

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1956No. 7590PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

We rendered a decision affirming that of the trial court. Both the appellant and respondent filed petitions for a rehearing which was ordered. This opinion is written upon reargument and a reconsideration of the entire case.

On December 15, 1943, Otto Engen secured a judgment quieting title in him to a large number of tracts of land in Mountrail County including the Northeast Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 155, Range 88. Among the defendants named were Millard Kincannon, Theadore L. Kincannon, and Anna L. Kin-cannon.

On November 14, 1922, Anna L.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moss v. ShearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Graves v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Hoffer v. CrawfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Mathwig v. StrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Burke v. ScharfNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Verry v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Buehner v. HoevenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. L. J. Hablas v. Armour and Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  4. Ford v. HoferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Johnson v. MarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API