Legal Opinion

Hopper v. Lockey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 21, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Ferradino, J.), entered March 3, 2004 in Saratoga County, which denied defendants’ cross motion seeking a declaration that a certain note and mortgage constituted a valid lien.

This case represents another chapter in the long, tortuous litigation between these parties (see 8 AD3d 802 [2004]; 241 AD2d 892 [1997]). In 1983, plaintiff and her husband, defendant Raymond H. Lockey, Jr. (hereinafter defendant), purchased two contiguous parcels of real property (see 241 AD2d 892, 892 [1997], supra). Between 1985 and 1992, the property was improved and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barden & Robeson Corp. v. CzyzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Hopper v. LockeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Carrara v. CarraraNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Carrara v. CarraraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  5. Hopper v. LockeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Geltzer v. Borriello (In Re Borriello)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  2. Ditech Fin. LLC v. TempleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API